Skip to main content

Recent comments

Hannu,

I think I may have conveyed my message badly in the post above.

My grudge wasn't with the women who get all these male followers thanks to their (the women's that is) obvious advantages. No, my grudge was with the horde of drooling men who join the stampede and follow troop in the like-avalanche of these women.

If the men were in it for the fishing and the good advice, they would not be following women who post a half naked pictures of themselves holding a fish now and then - and not much else - but follow fully dressed men and women, who actually contribute valuable knowledge and tips and not just bare skin.

I have no problem with people being rich in "the currency of social media" as you put it so well, but I do have a problem when these extremely popular pages and profiles are totally without substance. I know a lot of people (men) will say that there's nothing wrong with looking at pretty women, and they might be right. But I'm a little more old school when it comes to that, and think that these men - and also the women posing - reduce the few fishing women who actually do a good job to sex objects and not much else. I know it's a knee jerk response and an argument as old as... well older than me, actually, and that's old, but I still think it's a valid point. To me women are more than silicone implants and small bikinis.

Sure, people can do what they want, and I'm certain that the women do it by free will and get a certain satisfaction in seeing the reaction of their followers, but if all they have to offer is large breasts and duck's arse lips, I'm out – even if they hold up a fish now and then. In that respect I'm obviously not in agreement with several hundred thousand other men.

And I'm not envious of these women - just as I'm not envious of Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton or Snooki for having millions of likers and followers because they are famous for... nothing actually. I'm not in the game for the likes. I'm in it to have an outlet for my images and articles and for the networking, friendships and fishing it brings. Having hundreds of thousands of followers would probably give me more frustrations than joy.

With regards to the guide to Copenhagen and Denmark, it was one of the casualties in the conversion to a new system. I still have all the data, but haven't found time to convert it. It may come.

Martin

Very nice tie. Its a lot like Derrick Filkins' HPU(Hook Point Up) patterns, except he uses a piece of hard mono line to tie the pattern on and for the weed guard. Its quicker than having to use so much light cured resin, and cheaper since you can use a piece of grass trimmer line (this also makes great, large mono eyes). Also, you can tie onto the line instead of having to cram a lot of material behind the hook eye. You can even tie the material directly onto the mono on the vise tube-fly style, and then add it to the hook.

Submitted by Hannu Hakanen on

Permalink

I'm really sorry to see you comparing these talented, good looking or well produced girls and women to yourself trough your own idea of what is "the right way to fish" and then deeming that they are not "real fishermen." I know that likes and followers are the currency of social media, but comparing your figures to everything that has a word "fish" in the tittle gives really odd results as you noticed. Fishing is a great thing and it becomes greater by adding more diversity to it, may that be girls who like to look good while enjoying the great weather and drinks on Bahamas while angling, boys and girls fishing small in city canals for roach or middle aged men wading in strong winds middle of winter to catch the sea trout for Christmas table. Being envious of social media likes and friends of others and generating this kind of "wrong way to do my thing" posts does not do any good to anyone.

Anyway thank you for the great site, I've enjoyed the fly patterns greatly and your guide to Danish fishing spots around Copenhagen was worth it's weight in gold when I visited the city last spring (this seems to have been removed since from the site?) Keep up the great work and enjoy the likes you get and keen followers you have knowing they are there for what you do. Hopefully you'll get a lot more of both as you deserve.

Submitted by joel on

Permalink

MY GOODNESS! You are good friend, fisherman, rancher and artist too! Thanks for sharing your talent with us.

I do fly thing video's and have a huge red beard. My earlier films used to have my beard in the video. I thought for a sec, after seeing this screen shot that it was one of mine! HAHA Thats almost my exact beard color too!

I like your vice!

Martin, if you had a such a lovely pair as per the top photo, you might have a lot more fishing "friends" :)

Submitted by chong vincent on

Permalink

This presentation is so much simpler. Definitely a must try to see if the fishes will be willing to take a nip the next trip.

Submitted by chong vincent on

Permalink

Very useful tips for those who will try this technique for experiment purpose.

Very clever tie Dan. I'll have to give it a try after I find the right hackle. I think I would put the red spot a little more caudally so that its out of the way of the eyes.

This looks a lot like Dave's NearNuff Sculpin. The video is on this site in the pattern library. I'm thinking that changing the color pattern to white and using plastic bead chain eyes would make this a good snook fly.

Joe Mahler of Fort Myers Florida showed me a cool trick to keep the hook eye free of cement when cementing heads. Simply use a stick of cheap, generic lip balm ( Brand name Chapstick in the US) to coat the eye before applying cement. Not only does this keep the eye clear, but it lubricates the knot when tying on the tippet. No more putting the dirty line in your mouth and possibly hooking yourself when tying the fly onto the tippet. One stick should last for years. When breaking hard cement out of a hook eye, there may still be a rough edge that could weaken a fine tippet.

Submitted by John Black on

Permalink

As usual Dave a great fly.Dave I always have trouble winging flies any tips.

Submitted by Heath Miller on

Permalink

Occasional and closer shots of the fly hitting the water and fish ripping into would add excitement...great casting!

Submitted by Dan Cuomo on

Permalink

Very nice job! The music complements the film beautifully. What is the title, and who is it by, please?

Dave,

The debate about vise vs. vice pops up now and then and is probably as old as the tool itself. http://grammarist.com/spelling/vice-vise/

And no, it's not as simple as "a vise, not a vice". Both are fine and the spelling depends on what kind of English you write - and the writers mood.

For a non-English person like myself, I couldn't care less. I understand that a vice is not a bad habit of the tier (or is that tyer?), but the tool he uses - or rather doesn't use in this case.

Lately I have started writing vise rather than vice, but then the Brits (and The Aussies and the Kiwis, maybe?) are on my case.

Martin

Submitted by Dave White on

Permalink

Tied in the hand, means sans vise, not sans vice. One could say that salmon fly tying is a vice, however the tool that is omitted is a vise... :)

dw

Submitted by Camper Van Ren… on

Permalink

Iceland sure has many great fishing waters, both lakes and rivers. Two difficulties is that you have to book in advance on so many places. And with advance bookings I mean like even December the year before. Then we have the price tag on the best rivers. There are other ways you can fish in Iceland. Here is one of them. http://www.rent.is/blog/fishing-in-iceland/

Tight lines!

Submitted by Shawn on

Permalink

So I thought I responded to this already... Sorry if it ends up responding twice...

Thanks pj! I am partial to this fly. I've also been working hard to improve my vids.

Yes your right. It is a rooster... I said "grizzly saddle hackle" and I should have said rooster in there somewhere also. My apology. When making these vids I always end up leaving something out... Darn.

Just don't go use your dry fly hackle... You can get away with the hackle you use for wooly buggers or small streamers.

Submitted by Shawn on

Permalink

It is rooster, sorry I didn't specify on the video I guess... I think all I said was "grizzly saddle hackle". My apology. It is the cheaper streamer stuff though. I use this for wooly buggers and the line also. It's not dry fly hackle, so don't spend the money on that for this fly, or waste your good dry fly hackle either...

Submitted by Shawn on

Permalink

Do you guys like the new video format? I've been working on improving them. Let me know what you think.

Since you got this far …


The GFF money box

… I have a small favor to ask.

Long story short

Support the Global FlyFisher through several different channels, including PayPal.

Long story longer

The Global FlyFisher has been online since the mid-90's and has been free to access for everybody since day one – and will stay free for as long as I run it.
But that doesn't mean that it's free to run.
It costs money to drive a large site like this.
See more details about what you can do to help in this blog post.